Google Starts Verifying Google+ Accounts

Sunday, August 21, 2011 5:52
Posted in category google

Google is rolling out verification badges to Google+ users who qualify as celebrities, public figures, or those who have simply been added to a lot of circles (though they do not specify how many circles this requires). But fret not. That’s just the beginning.

Google’s Wen-Ai Yu writes in a Google+ post, “For now, we’re focused on verifying public figures, celebrities, and people who have been added to a large number of Circles, but we’re working on expanding this to more folks.”

google-plus-four_616

“Many celebrities and public figures are joining Google+, and if you’re like me, you want to be sure the person you’re adding to a circle is really who they claim to be,” she says.

No dispute there.

Some celebrities have had a little trouble keeping their G+ account up and running in the past (see William Shatner).

Getting people to add others to circles is obviously an important factor in continued Google+ user engagement. And nobody is going to get more followers than celebrities and public figures, so it makes sense that they would start the verification process here.

Celebrity use has been huge for Twitter’s growth (and probably hasn’t hurt Facebook’s either). Verified celebs and the recent addition of games should be tremendously helpful for Google to keep people coming back to their Google+ accounts.

Latest Google Doodle Introduces Us To Alexander Calder

Sunday, July 24, 2011 3:59
Posted in category google

calder_doodle_616

The Google Doodles are a great deal more prolific than they used to be. What used to be an occasional thing is now frequent. To wit, today’s Alexander Calder doodle marks the second Google logo alteration this week. Granted, the Calder doodle is a little different than Gregor Mendel’s; Calder’s is interactive, but it just goes to show the frequency Google is introducing these things.

As indicated, the Calder logo is different from the Mendel doodle due to the fact it’s an interactive doodle that has to be hovered over before you can access the related search results. Normally, you simply have to click on whatever celebratory logo Google is using, and you are directed to search results related to the subject of the doodle. With the Calder logo — which simulates a mobile — the logo must be hovered over with the mouse, bringing up the following clickable link:

calder_doodle_hover

Once clicked, users are taken to the requisite Google results page. The reason the current doodle appears to be a mobile sculpture is because Calder is credited with inventing them. A snippet from Wikipedia reveals more:

Alexander Calder (July 22, 1898 – November 11, 1976) was an American sculptor and artist most famous for inventing mobile sculptures. In addition to mobile and stable sculpture, Alexander Calder also created paintings, lithographs, toys, tapestry, jewelry and household objects.

With that, I’ve learned something today. Concerning the inspiration for the doodle, there’s a post by Jered Wierzbicki at the Google Blog which details the reason Calder was chosen:

Last year I wandered into a white room at Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago full of Alexander Calder’s delicate “objects,” all beautifully balanced and proportioned, moving gently in the air currents like a whimsical metal forest. Calder took ordinary materials at hand—wire, scraps of sheet metal—and made them into brilliant forms, letting space and motion do the rest. As an engineer, I work with abstractions, too, so this really struck me.

But you kind of want to play with the things. They do not let you do that at museums.

So I coded up a very basic demo of a mobile and showed it to a friend, who showed it to one of our doodlers—and then this amazing thing happened: talented artists and engineers who liked the idea just started to help! What we ended up with is way cooler than anything I could have built on my own.

Wierzbicki goes on to say that the latest doodle was built using an “HTML 5 canvas,” and because of that, you’ll need a modern browser to use it (updated versions of Google Chrome, Firefox and/or the latest version of Internet Explorer).

Google+ Growth Outpaces Twitter, Facebook by Lengths and Bounds

Saturday, July 23, 2011 2:37
Posted in category google

google_plus_chart_616

Undoubtedly fueled by the perceived exclusivity, coupled with the tech/geek crowd absolutely embracing it, when it comes to initial growth, Google+ is absolutely lapping Twitter and Facebook in terms of reaching certain milestones. In this case, the milestone being discussed is the first to 10 million users, and, as you’ll see in the upcoming chart, the Google+ uptake has been quite impressive.

Help Google Crawl Your Site More Effectively, But Use Caution

Saturday, July 23, 2011 2:33
Posted in category google

Google has introduced some changes to Webmaster Tools – in particular, handling of URLs with parameters.

“URL Parameters helps you control which URLs on your site should be crawled by Googlebot, depending on the parameters that appear in these URLs,” explains Kamila Primke, Software Engineer with the Google Webmaster Tools Team. “This functionality provides a simple way to prevent crawling duplicate content on your site. Now, your site can be crawled more effectively, reducing your bandwidth usage and likely allowing more unique content from your site to be indexed. If you suspect that Googlebot’s crawl coverage of the content on your site could be improved, using this feature can be a good idea. But with great power comes great responsibility! You should only use this feature if you’re sure about the behavior of URL parameters on your site. Otherwise you might mistakenly prevent some URLs from being crawled, making their content no longer accessible to Googlebot.”

parameter-page

Google is now letting users describe the behavior of parameters. For example, you can let Google know if a parameter changes the actual content of the page.

“If the parameter doesn’t affect the page’s content then your work is done; Googlebot will choose URLs with a representative value of this parameter and will crawl the URLs with this value,” says Primke. “Since the parameter doesn’t change the content, any value chosen is equally good. However, if the parameter does change the content of a page, you can now assign one of four possible ways for Google to crawl URLs with this parameter.”

Those would be: let Googlebot decide, every URL, only crawl URLS with value or no URLs.

Users can tell Google if a parameter sorts, paginates, determines content, or other things that it might do. For each parameter, Google will also “try” to show you a sample of example URLs from your site that it has already crawled that contain a given parameter.

To bring up the use of caution again, Primke warns about the responsibilities that come with using the No URLs option. “This option is the most restrictive and, for any given URL, takes precedence over settings of other parameters in that URL. This means that if the URL contains a parameter that is set to the ‘No URLs’ option, this URL will never be crawled, even if other parameters in the URL are set to ‘Every URL.’ You should be careful when using this option. The second most restrictive setting is ‘Only URLs with value=x.’”

She runs through some examples in this blog post, and there is more related information in Google’s Webmaster Help forum.

Be Careful About Selling the Same Stuff From Multiple Domains

As long as we’re discussing webmaster issues for Google, I’ll also point to the latest Webmaster Help video from Matt Cutts, who discusses selling products on multiple domains. The user question he sought to answer was:

“I manage 3 websites that sell the same products across 3 domains. Each site has a different selling approach, price structure, target audience, etc. Does Google see this as spumy or black hat?”

Cutts says, “On one hand, if the domains are radically different lay-out, different selling approach, different structure – like, essentially completely different, and especially the fact that you said it’s only 3 domains, that might not be so bad. Clearly if it were 300 domains or 3,000 domains – you can quickly get to a fairly large number of domains that can be crowding up the search results and creating a bad user experience…by the time you get to a relatively medium-sized number of sites.”

“The thing that was interesting about the question is that you said it’s the same products, as in identical. So it’s a little weird if you’re selling identical products across 3 domains. If you were selling like men’s sweaters on one, and women’s sweaters on another, and shoes on a third….I’ve said before, there’s no problem with having different domains for each product, and a small number of domains (2, 3, or 4) for very normally separable reasons can make perfect sense, but it is a little strange to sell the same products, so if they’re really identical, that starts to look a little bit strange – especially if you start to get more than 3 domains.”

“Definitely, I have found that if you have one domain, you’ve got the time to build it up – to build the reputation for that domain…in my experience, when someone has 50 or 100 domains, they tend not to put as much work – as much love into each individual domain, and whether they intend to or not, that tends to show after a while. People have the temptation to auto-generate content or they just try to syndicate a bunch of feeds, and then you land on one domain vs. another domain, and it really looks incredibly cookie cutter – comparing the two domains, and that’s when users start to complain.